Artificial intelligence has mastered many domains—chess, protein folding, autonomous driving. But there is one frontier it has yet to conquer: the depth, ambiguity, and conceptual complexity of human thought itself.
Psychoanalysis, one of the most intricate and philosophically rich domains of cognitive inquiry, has historically been resistant to formalization. Unlike structured fields such as physics or mathematics, psychoanalysis operates through dense conceptual networks, evolving theoretical paradigms, and interpretative reasoning that lacks rigid computational models. The field’s vast literature spans over a century, with thousands of books, journal articles, unpublished correspondences, and competing theoretical frameworks—each with its own lexicon, its own logic, its own implicit assumptions.
This is where Noēsis comes in.